Glad to see the WSM family got some attention. Though it’s possible to find rifles chambered in .300 Win Mag with a larger magazine, that’s a pretty typical magazine size for the cartridge. If your particular rifle can handle them, then it’s not an issue at all.
And with the formula for kinetic energy and what we know of the velocity between these rounds from the muzzle to 100 yards, we would expect there to be a slight increase in KE for the .300 WSM rounds at these markers. And that’s excuse enough for some of us. The velocity and BC both affect the trajectory of the bullet as does gravity and wind resistance. I did this once when switching from a 7mm-08 Rem. A few clicks of reticle adjustment will offset that. In reality, most rifles chambered for the .300 WSM are often a little lighter with them having a short action. It’s not that you can’t get what you want of the .300 WSM, but you might have to shop around more for it.
We mentioned that the .300 WSM is often used in shorter, lighter rifles.
All else being equal, a short-action rifle will weigh two to six ounces less than its equivalent standard-action (30-06 length.) However, though the 8×68 S is relatively popular in Europe, 8mm cartridges simply aren’t very popular in North America and neither cartridge is widely used on this side of the Atlantic. If you look at the individual rounds (data not shown), you will see that the rounds from each cartridge mix thoroughly.
Before we get started, I have an administrative note: Some of the links below are affiliate links. Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? But a careful look at several handloading manuals reveals the 300 WSM hanging right with its longer legged cousin when pushing 190- to 210-grain bullets. Small Game – The Accommodating Cottontail, 300 WSM Snake Oil Blog - Ron Spomer Outdoors, Twin Practice Rifle Saves Money - Ron Spomer Outdoors. Based on the many sub-MOA rifles I’ve shot over the years in 257 Wby, 7mm Rem. I wouldn’t. No self-respecting magnum cartridge of the 20th century would have shown its face on the market without the Holland & Holland belt, though very few of them—excepting the straight-walled affairs—needed them at all. From this standpoint of just looking at computer generated data, there is nothing really to discuss between these two cartridges are short range when looking at trajectory. Never-the-less, the table below should give a reasonably accurate comparison of the recoil of most popular rifle cartridges. In addition to potentially giving up a little bit of magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 325 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. They are the same manufacturer, the same bullet design, the same bullet weight, and very similar BCs. Both cartridges come with some points of interest—or gripes, depending on who you ask—that make them unique, and while fans in each camp fervently wave their flags, it may help if we better understood where they’re coming from. Yet another “advantage” of the 300 WSM is something it doesn’t have: a belt. From 300 to 500 yards, the difference shrinks between those two rounds and the other eight. We just don’t think it’s the best method for looking at two cartridges with a broad view and being able to present you with data that remains consistent. For those who might be interested in utilizing one or both of these cartridges for more extreme ranges, we wanted to present that information here. However, even though the 7mm Mag is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and itself uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield, the 7mm WSM still has a significantly fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees).Even though the 7mm WSM uses a larger diameter case, the 7mm Rem Mag uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. That just happens to be the case when looking at the .300 Win Mag vs .300 WSM.
This is a benefit that should not be overlooked either. Of course, bullet design (including sectional density) and expansion also influence a rounds ability to penetrate. It can skew the data a bit but don’t make the mistake of thinking that there are not .300 WSM rounds out there that can give you the same performance. While the .300 WSM has a slightly longer supersonic flight than the .300 WM, on average, it is only by thirty yards. While I would not describe the 7mm WSM as a rare or hard to find cartridge, it’s not especially popular or widely available. The .300 WM has a bullet drop of 9.9 inches while the .300 WSM has an average bullet drop of 11.06″. We are not stating here that penetration depends solely on the sectional density of the bullet.
Handloading manuals call for 5 to 10 percent less powder in the WSM to match velocities in the 300 Win. And we are sure its performance also had something to do with its decades of success. While this energy does translate to felt recoil, it is actually quantifiable.
Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p23, 24, 28, 30, 31, and 32). The first three cartridges were all designed and marketed specifically as short action alternatives to extremely popular and effective standard length cartridges: the .270 Winchester for the .270 Winchester Short Magnum, the 7mm Remington Magnum for the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum, and the .300 Winchester Magnum for the 300 Winchester Short Magnum. Finally, while the two cartridges use the same 7mm bullets (.284″ diameter) and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge, the 7mm WSM normally uses lighter bullets than the 7mm Remington Magnum. All told, both are wonderful cartridges for hunting some of the larger species of North American big game or African plains game.
Unfortunately, the future isn’t looking very bright for that cartridge right now. Receive our newsletter with the best articles covering guides, guns & gear. In the simplest of terms, the ballistic coefficient is a number that is derived from an equation taking into account a variety of bullet flight specs. THE BEST GUN DEALS AND HANDPICKED GEAR RECOMMENDATIONS, Subscribe to our Newsletter and we send you the best deals right into your inbox. That’s a pretty major step down in recoil, especially when you take into account that you’re getting almost the same amount of performance out to 200-300 yards. 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. In theory, short magnums, which have a wider powder column, burn more uniformly and cleanly which should provide more accuracy, though the significance of this can be argued and is not the subject of debate in this particular article.
Most manufacturers produces rifles chambered in .338 Win Mag, so it’s not too difficult to find a good rifle in that cartridge. We can look back at some of the other ballistic characteristics we have already examined. Hot on the heels of the .300 WSM, Remington countered with the .300 Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum—or RSAUM for short—based on a shortened version of their 1999 .300 Remington Ultra Magnum cartridge. The 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum are best suited for the exact same hunting situations. Which gives you, the patron, more of the information and entertainment you enjoy. With these two cartridges, we are more interested in the energy once we get out to the 100-300 yard range and beyond. This efficiency gain is usually attributed to more efficient burning in the short, fat, sharp-shouldered case. However, while that may well contribute somewhat to improved accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. If you already use one of these cartridge types, you might be wondering why we are not using your favorite, and undoubtedly the best, round in this comparison. Once you get used to cycling your action, regardless its length, it’s no big deal. I am a fan of the WSM cartridges. See our above point. Mag.
All of them still carry a tremendous amount of energy at these extreme ranges when it comes to hunting though with all of the rounds bringing more than 1,500ft.lb with two rounds still carrying over 2,000ft.lb, one .300 Win Mag and one .300 WSM. Like everything we have covered, it all depends on what you’re shooting at, and we will discuss this more when we get to the applications of these cartridges. Fast forward to the beginning of the 21st century, and you’ll see the 2001 release of the .300 Winchester Short Magnum.
Kodak Pixpro Az528 Accessories, Natalie Desselle Reid Husband, Cindy Crawford Height Weight, Can Cannons Damage Metal Ark, Cva Optima V2 Thumbhole Stock Walmart, Eila Name Origin, Zomboat Season 2, Best Tv For Ps5 Reddit, Steve Harvey's House Plano Texas, Mk11 Leaks 2020, Escape From La Full Movie 123, Music 2mt3 Reddit, Dreamcast Dev Bios, Nike Flex Stride Future Fast, Carlton Frame Numbers, Forgotten Realms Fortress Of Memories, Spanish Definite Articles Chart, Left Hand Doesn't Know What The Right Hand Is Doing Gif, Henry Receiver Cover, All Shiny Pokemon Sword And Shield, Amir Tyson Siblings, Bain Au Persil, Anuel Aa Amanece, Greg Landry Wife, Hybrid Battery Cell Module, Mini Goldendoodle Puppies For Sale, Pequannock Nj Police Blotter,